Meta Platforms has asked a U.S. court to rule that it did not violate copyright law when it used books by writer Ta-Nehisi ...

Since the 2023 decision, appellate courts have focused more closely on whether a new work truly has a further purpose or different character, as well as the purpose and nature of the use.

AI developer ROSS Intelligence filed a petition for the certification of an interlocutory appeal to challenge originality and ...

The “fair use” legal defence used by Meta and Anthropic last week against separate allegations of copyright infringement for training Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools with published books ...

A federal judge granted Ross Intelligence Inc.'s request to pause its dispute with Thomson Reuters and allow it to appeal a ...

"I think that with respect to content that's already on the open web, the social contract of that content since the nineties has been that it is fair use. Anyone can copy it, recreate with it ...

Anthropic told, opens new tab the court that it made fair use of their works by transforming them into something new, raising a key argument for tech companies defending against high-stakes ...

“Publishers are essentially asking the court to define the contours of a licensing market for AI training where the threshold question of fair use remains unsettled,” the judge wrote.

While some companies, like Meta, argue that their use of copyrighted material falls under fair use, others claim it infringes on copyright laws.” (In a 2024 statement, Meta describes such ...

As the copyright holders, the music publishers argue that such use of their songs aren’t considered fair use under U.S. copyright law. U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee wrote that although the ...

Hello @TSeries, stop being a stooge. Parody & Satire comes under fair use Legally. I haven’t used the lyrics or the original instrumental of the song. If you take this video down every cover ...