Thanks to recent remarks by Paul McCartney in the New Yorker, maybe we now can all finally agree that a rivalry between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones was — and is! — a real thing, as ...

The Beatles and Rolling Stones were two of England’s biggest bands in the 1960s, yet they rarely crossed paths professionally. Paul McCartney said the press manufactured the rivalry between the ...

Music gave me a warm blanket to wrap myself in. By the time I graduated from West Anchorage High School in 1972, I had ...

The Beatles and The Rolling Stones are two of the biggest bands of all time. They've competed with each other and traded insults over the years. by Emma McKee. Published on February 28, 2023.

"Beatles vs. Stones," John McMillian Simon & Schuster The Beatles and the Rolling Stones represent two sides of one of the Twentieth Century's greatest aesthetic debates.

The Beatles and The Rolling Stones! Top contenders for The Greatest Band Ever — and both with new music coming out. Simultaneously. Their first in decades. Thursday morning at 10 a.m., ...

Paul McCartney called the Rolling Stones a "blues cover band," and here's "Long Tall Sally" from the Beatles' time as a rock cover band.

The Rolling Stones covered the Beatles' "Come Together" for the first time during the band's set on the opening night of the all-star Desert Trip.

The Rolling Stones’ new album Hackney Diamonds–their first album of new, original music in 18 years–is both a much different type of project than “Now and Then,” and a strangely similar one.

When Paul McCartney and Mick Jagger volleyed over the Stones' 'blues cover band' status, it was the flare-up of a rivalry between frenemies. Plus Icon Film Plus Icon TV Plus Icon What To Watch ...

The Beatles and the Rolling Stones represent two sides of one of the Twentieth Century's greatest aesthetic debates. In this excerpt from his book Beatles vs. Stones, historian John McMillian ...