News
Simple cubic might in fact be the closest — and thus energetically favoured — packing possible for the new arrangement: whereas for spheres, the space-filling factor of 74% for f.c.c. or ...
For truncated cubes, the densest packing is only subtly different from the simple cubic lattice and their packing fractions differ by only 0.7%.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results