Anthropic had a big win in court last month when a US judge said AI training was fair use. But only when an AI company copies ...

Within the same week, two judges in the Northern District of California issued groundbreaking summary judgment rulings regarding whether an ...

On Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria seemed to do so reluctantly, calling his ...

While the startup has won its “fair use” argument, it potentially faces billions of dollars in damages for allegedly pirating ...

Legal implications of generative AI models on copyright laws, fair use, and IP rights explored globally and in U.S. rulings.

Judge Alsup’s summary judgement order in Bartz v Anthropic PBC1 released June 23, 2025 is making waves in the copyright and ...

Copyrighted books can be used to train artificial intelligence models without authors’ consent, a federal judge ruled Monday — a major victory for Anthropic.

The federal judge who ruled in Meta’s favor still isn’t convinced its use of copyrighted materials for AI training qualifies as fair use.

"Rather than walking through the four-factor fair use analysis for each case, this column will discuss two significant ...

Companies backing GenAI have argued that the use of copyrighted training data is defensible under "fair use," similar to a ...

The first-of-its-kind ruling that condones AI training as fair use will likely be viewed as a big win for AI companies, but ...

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late on Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its ...