Free Speech. No Government Action (and Thus No First Amendment Violation) in Suspension of Plaintiffs' YouTube Accounts So holds a federal district court, rejecting plaintiff's theories that ...

I have a new draft up on SSRN, called The First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action.I'd appreciate constructive comments from anyone who's interested! Here's the abstract: In the wake of ...

It said that a government official’s personal social media page could be considered a public forum – and covered by the First Amendment’s prohibitions against certain state action ...

There is nothing “neutral” about Big Tech’s actions to censor Americans with whom the liberal elites disagree, especially when this censorship occurs at the direction of the government.

The government may encourage them to use that discretion, but when government contacts go beyond persuasion to coercion, the government’s actions violate the First Amendment.

On the first day of his second term, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at "restoring freedom of speech." But judging from his administration's policies and his actions as a ...

The Supreme Court said Monday that it will consider whether the First Amendment protects social media users from being blocked from commenting on the personal pages that government officials use ...