Thorium is a by-product, and extraction of thorium requires methods that are costlier than for uranium. So, as it stands, the amount of thorium that can be pulled out of the ground in a cost ...

They produce less radioactive waste, and these by-products are safe after about 100 years, versus 24,000 years for uranium reactors. The safe storage of thorium nuclear waste is much less complex.

Thorium, an abundant and safer alternative to uranium, ... which supposedly indicates the presence of enough of the radioactive metal to meet the nation's energy demands for 60,000 years. ...

The radioactive decay time of thorium is just 300 years, compared to 300,000 for uranium. And according to Transmutex, its system would produce much smaller amounts of this hazardous waste.

Waste from thorium reactors is dramatically less radioactive than uranium rods, requiring hundreds of years in storage rather than thousands. Thorium reactors can also“burn”plutonium, so ...

At the same time, uranium-233, the primary fission material produced from thorium, is harder to use for weapons purposes than uranium-235 or plutonium-239. This means there is less of a risk its ...

Thorium is highly efficient, with a single ton producing energy equivalent to 200 tons of uranium or 3.5 million tons of coal, supporting sustainability and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Scientists have built the first-ever thorium reactor. Thorium is both more easily accessible and less dangerous than uranium—the most common fission fuel. The system also uses molten salt ...

Dust, perched mostly out of sight of workers on the buildings’ rafters, contained both uranium and thorium. After Dow, Consolidated Aluminum Corp. owned the 10 buildings from 1969 to 1986.