Jan 23, 2014 · I have a hard time understanding why $\\ln e=1$ Can someone explain to me why the natural logarithm of e is exactly equal to the first nonzero but positive integer?

Oct 7, 2017 · ln(lne) = ln1 = 0 The logarithm on base a of a is always 1, since a1. In addition, it has to be a> 0 and a other than 1, so that there are no problems.

Oct 31, 2021 · The natural logarithm is multivalued with respect to complex numbers. This means that the natural logarithm is not a function because its outputs are not unique. In order to deal …

I am nit sure it is a proof....but anyway: From the definition of log: log_bx=a auch that: x=b^a that is, the integrand is equal to the base to the power of the result. In our case we know that the …

is it possible to show that ln e = 1 ln e = 1 without showing first that exp exp and ln ln are inverse functions? Here, e e is defined by the series

Apr 12, 2018 · I was trying to do an integration problem with u sub and got stuck, one part of the equation was this $\\ln(e^{2x+1})$ this is suppose to simplify really nicely according to a site, is …

Dec 6, 2017 · I know that $$\\ln e^2=2$$ But what about this? $$(\\ln e)^2$$ A calculator gave 1. I'm really confused.

Mar 14, 2020 · I don't really understand the step by step procedure on how to calculate this? That $-$ confuses me, because I don't understand how there can be an $\\ln$ of a negative …

Dec 5, 2023 · Expanding on Henning's comment, even "ln" is ambiguous in the wider community because it's interpreted as short for "logarithm" versus the esoteric "logarithmus naturalis" (in …

Let me me add another one for passers by : We can get the perpendicular distance from the point to the line by : ax+by+c a2+b2√ a x + b y + c a 2 + b 2 where a, b, c are coefficients of the line …